albertjones
Old photos have a certain vibe you can’t really recreate, but at the same time a lot of them don’t age well physically. I’ve gone through a bunch of vintage shots where the texture looked cool, but the actual details were fading or damaged. At some point I got curious what can realistically be fixed and what’s just part of the “retro” look. While digging into it, I checked skylum.com/blog/types-of-old-p... and it actually breaks down the types of damage that can be restored pretty clearly. Made me look at old photos differently and not just accept every flaw as permanent
No comments
EXIF data
Brand
Apple
Model
iPhone 6 Plus
Aperture
ƒ/2.2
Focal length
4mm
Shutter speed
1/105s
ISO
32
No likes
Delete photo
This photo and all its comments will be deleted immediately. You can’t undo this action.
albertjones Old photos have a certain vibe you can’t really recreate, but at the same time a lot of them don’t age well physically. I’ve gone through a bunch of vintage shots where the texture looked cool, but the actual details were fading or damaged. At some point I got curious what can realistically be fixed and what’s just part of the “retro” look. While digging into it, I checked skylum.com/blog/types-of-old-p... and it actually breaks down the types of damage that can be restored pretty clearly. Made me look at old photos differently and not just accept every flaw as permanent