vera Yes! I didn't take my tripod and tried to make long exposure leaning on the barrier of the bridge. But it was not successful :-( ! So I opted for sharpness ... unfortunately it is not absolutely top... And I don't knwo if the 25mm is adapted for this kind of landscape? Though I like the composition of the pic ;-)
Kazzi
25mm (50mm equiv.) is a standard focal lenght, so we can agree it's suitable for every type of photography. Maybe it's not a perfect field of view for landscapes, but I also like that composition :)
Next time try to lower the ISO and don't go with apertures over 11-16, because on our 16mpix micro four thirds sensors there is a monster lowering overall sharpness and it's name is DIFFRACTION... :( take a look at those charts: with f/8 whole image should be much sharper, and it'd require ISO 200 lenstip.com/401.4-Lens_review-...
vera Oh you're great Kazziz! Thank you for your advices and the link! I did'nt even realized that my iso was so high... You're right! I already found that the quality of the image is less good with a high iso ...
Kazzi make a test of using f/8 and f/22 for the same shot - You can do it with a tripod. You'll see that the second one will be less sharp.
Maybe the high iso was the problem with long exposures?
vera Yes... that's what I think now ! ;-P
Kazzi Kazzi support and gear-geek, always ready to help :)
vera Thanks!
Kazzi Nice! I'd use a polarising filter to kill those reflections and ND filter to make a longer exposition. Looking from Your exif, with that much closed aperture and that high ISO You wanted to have a whole landscape sharp and the water movement frozen. Am I right?